from the so-much-truth dept
In information that may shock principally nobody, Fact Social, Trump’s social community that was pitched as being about bringing free speech again and never doing any “viewpoint discrimination,” at the same time as its phrases of service promised it might be closely moderated, is now banning customers for attempting to unfold some “truths” in regards to the January 6 hearings.
Tsk tsk. What has grow to be of free speech?
I imply, this is not the primary time folks have observed this. However it’s value calling out, particularly as folks hold insisting that websites like Twitter and YouTube ought to by no means reasonable something based mostly on “viewpoint discrimination.”
So, will Texas AG Ken Paxton kick off an investigation into Fact Social’s moderation practices? Will Elon Musk insist that he must buy Fact Social to convey free speech again? Will Trump supporters who insist that “huge tech is censoring” their voices admit that little tech is now doing the reverse? Will Challenge Veritas catfish Fact Social staff and launch deceptive movies?
Will actually anybody who has been talking nonsense about how any of that is about “free speech” admit that perhaps they have been incorrect?
Or will everybody simply go on tradition warrioring, and pretending nothing in any respect occurred?
Filed Below: content material moderation, devin nunes, donald trump, free speech, january sixth
Firms: fact social